by Jen G 
With the proposed ten luxury high rises coming to Greenpoint, adding over 5000 new homes to the area, nearby residents of The Greenpoint Hotel currently live in deplorable conditions. With rents on the rise, are low income residents being victimized by landlords looking to cash in on valuable real estate?
It ain’t the Greenpoint depicted in Girls – that’s for sure.
In 2006, the NY Times described the The Greenpoint…
7
Free to read, funded by readers. Join as a member and get a free gift.
Greenpointers has covered Greenpoint & Williamsburg since 2007 — community boards, rezoning fights, local businesses, and the people whose lives and work give the neighborhood its character. Local news is collapsing across the country, but we're still here: independently owned, no corporate backing, no paywall. 18+ years, 280k+ monthly readers and followers, funded by the community we serve.
Why your support matters
Thank you for this!! I’m having anxiety about this beautiful little place called Greenpoint. My, how the gentrification train is going to cause a culture shock. This is a great article.
I am very familiar with the Greenpoint Hotel and while I absolutely don’t agree with the living conditions, I must point out that this isn’t new and is most definitely not as related to rising property values. I have been in that neighborhood since the late 80’s and the conditions of the hotel have been exactly the same. The low rent means you have ex-cons and varying degrees of mentally ill people. I’ve always seen it as a halfway house and found its existence to be a detriment to the area. Of course it smells like weed and piss, they’re not normal people. I’ve seen them follow and harass local women. I’ve seem them drunkenly intimidate passerby’s. I’ve seen them openly buy drugs. Not all of the residents are this way, many of them are simply only able to afford this but it doesn’t take away from the fact that a good number of them are dangerous and a threat to the community. Why are you defending this? There are plenty of low income families in that area who I am sure are facing real problems with their landlords.
I do not think that the rising property values have anything to do with The Greenpoint Hotel – in fact this place most likely negatively impacts property value very close to it. I also point out that the conditions there have not changed in years. That is the problem. Regardless of the residents’ issues with addiction and mental illness – they do not deserve to live in squalor. Perhaps they’d have a better go at things if conditions were improved. And the landlord shouldn’t get away with it.
I must say I am quite pleased to see so many blogs, Greenpointers included, address this issue. While this and the proposed “new plans” for Greenpoint are quite disturbing, it is somewhat comforting to see a community fight “the good fight” even if the task seems impossible to take on.
Thanks. Nothing is impossible.
The sad thing is for what the city pays for these rat holes, the people could be housed in good hotels. Ridiculous. It’s a form of punishment for being downtrodden.
Thanks so much for the coverage, Jen.
I wanted to point out that all of the tenants say that conditions have gotten much, much worse since Jay Deutchman took over three years ago. They’re also under the impression that he’s trying hard to sell the building, or, failing that, to bring in a non-profit three-quarter-house type program in which he gets paid much more per tenant than $250. Either way, the more rent-stabilized tenants who are out, the better for him.
I can’t say for sure whether he’s being strategic here or just criminally negligent, because I’m not in the man’s head. But St. Nicks, and other tenant advocates in the neighborhood, are very familiar with landlords using any method at their disposable to remove their rent-stabilized tenants, and this is certainly of a piece with that.
Also, Grnpnt’s comments about the residents amount to an incorrect blanket statement. Many of these residents have problems (many of them are veterans), but the vast, vast majority of them are decent people who don’t bother anybody. Lumping all of them together is simply incorrect. Most of these residents are decent people. Either way, they’re entitled by law to clean, safe living conditions.
Also, Deutchman’s repeated contentions that the tenants are responsible for the state of the building are ludicrous; that’s victim-blaming and stigmatization at it’s worst. Did the tenants turn off the heat for months on end during the winter? Did the tenants rip the floors out? Please…
Thanks again for covering this, Jen.
Greg